Their 1 440p G-Sync 8-bit TN Monitor is but one example. It's hard to not like what Asus has done, in terms of monitor innovation, over the last year. The new Asus PB278Q features a PLS panel that has more light and better viewing angles than IPS options. That being said for the Thunderbolt you are getting Apple's quality control which includes everything from image processing to the monitor's backlighting. There are certainly better options out there in terms of color accuracy and quality and even the LG UM95 that has a Thunderbolt input. That really depends on the monitor you're looking at. While slightly more expensive than TN or twisted nematic panels, they offer better color accuracy and don't have the poor viewing angles that so often plague TN types.Īre these as good as the Apple Thunderbolt Display? If you're a photo editor or need color accuracy, then you should go with an IPS or in-plane-switching panel. While there are many more panel options than just IPS and TN, I generally separate them into this category because of simplicity. Before you go with a 4k option, be sure to know your Mac's compatibility.
#Best monitor for mac users pro#
The MacBook Pro Retina 15 Inch from late 2013 as well as Mac Pro from late 2013 should support 60Hz displays using multi-stream transport. While a MacBook Pro supports up to a 2560 x 1600 resolution not all of them support 4k resolution monitors and even fewer support at a 60Hz refresh rate.
The only other compatibility issue to be concerned with is resolution. Does the MacBook Pro Support 4k Resolution?
0 kommentar(er)
